It doesn't
sound impossible, nor will it need new technology. Hey, I have no idea at all
about exactly what size and number of parachutes will be needed to keep a
passenger aircraft afloat, but it does
seem plausible.
If we take a
smaller private jet, I think it can have a built in safety parachute system,
for emergencies. And with safety being the most important factor why not
manufacture smaller planes with this safety mechanism built into them.
Just a
thought that I wanted to share with you all :)
And finally someone was good enough to share some pretty good information on it, thanks 'Anonymous' for the link from Yahoo Answers UK, here it is - http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091130051003AAjSZ5m
OR click here to go directly to the link!
I have been thinking about this a lot lately as well. I mean, perhaps Buddy Holly, John Denver, JFK Jr, and countless others might not have died in single-engine plane crashes. At least we could slow them down so they aren't so dangerous to people and buildings when they do crash. Seems like a no-brainer to me. But most people on the Internet miss the point, and when you ask this question they think you mean "why don't we require a parachute for each passenger?" Let me know if anyone else has agreed with you on this.
ReplyDeleteHey Richard, you are absolutely right, it is such a no-brainer that people just don't get it :) I do hope someone somewhere who knows why this hasn't been done reads this... and we can get some kind of an answer.
ReplyDeleteSanjeev
These are the people that have no conscious thought about inertia, speed, pressure etc..
ReplyDeleteAnd by that I don't mean you guys replying before me :)
ReplyDeletehttp://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091130051003AAjSZ5m
ReplyDeleteExplains it pretty well for anyone still checking this page.
Thank you so much for the link, it really answers everything... am putting it in the article body itself... thanks Anynymous :)
ReplyDeleteSanjeev